Comments for Immortal

Comment on Jacob Barnett and Scientific Progress by Peter Marks

Peter Marks — Mon, 16 Jan 2012 05:14:01 +0000

To Kristine, Jake’s Mother:
I think it would be a very good idea for Jake to have extended and constant communication with Dr. Stephen Hawking as Dr, Hawking’s body is failing him and his mind isn’t. Dr. Hawking will provide Jake with all his knowledge and Jake will understand what Dr. Hawking is saying. Were Jake to record every conversation he has with Dr. Hawking he will give himself the opportunity to expand on Dr. Hawking’s theories in the future. It is sad to say but Dr. Hawking won’t be with us much longer and Dr. Hawking will be more than willing to impart his knowledge to Jake and advance science into the future. Jake is the future of science and the more knowledge he has available to him the more he will learn and the longer he will stay awake at night with numbers running through his head. Your son is a world treasure and every door is to be opened to him. Thank you.
Peter Marks
Greenbrae, CA

Comment on The Truth about OzRipOff, CSI Arbitrage and Shane Greenup by Aegist

Aegist — Wed, 02 Nov 2011 05:54:33 +0000

Worth highlighting that Pickering is finally getting the attention he deserves. Now we can only hope the Police will finally do something and throw him and his accomplices in to prison.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOD6qj0c80Y

Comment on The Truth about OzRipOff, CSI Arbitrage and Shane Greenup by Larry Pickering and CSI Arbitrage’s Day of Judgement

Larry Pickering and CSI Arbitrage’s Day of Judgement — Sun, 16 Oct 2011 07:40:39 +0000

[...] How Larry Pickering also controls OzRipOff, and they used that to slander their opponents. [...]

Comment on Jacob Barnett and Scientific Progress by Mitix

Mitix — Thu, 25 Aug 2011 07:24:58 +0000

Hi, I’m impressed about this kid and I’d like to make a proposal to his parents: please, let him go to Switzerland, to take part under professional surveillance in LHC Project. It will be a chance to all of us to make the step forward. And I’m convinced it will be of a real pleasure to him. His brightness of the mind shouldn’t be wasted.

Comment on Alan Jones on Climate Change and the Carbon Tax by Aegist

Aegist — Thu, 28 Jul 2011 09:25:54 +0000

Can you provide a reference (source) for your claim that the UN rejected their most recent claims please? And I’d be surprised anyone doesn’t know that Holland holds back the seas with their dykes – this isn’t news, nor related to climate change. I have no idea why you think it would be. It wasn’t mentioned in my article, or any other article I have ever seen on the subject.

Comment on Alan Jones on Climate Change and the Carbon Tax by Aegist

Aegist — Thu, 28 Jul 2011 09:23:50 +0000

This claim of ‘Vital for life’ is completely missing the point. There is no argument that CO2 is necessary for plant life and other functions. This is not questioned, nor even relevant. The concern is that as the quantity of airborn CO2 increases, the green house affect of it will be increased, and thus temperature will increase. The green house affect of CO2 is beyond dispute, and so this concern is a real one. I’ve heard that Alan Jones like to say that sort of “CO2 is not a pollutant” rubbish before, but he is mixing apples and oranges. The fact that CO2 in itself won’t kill you, doesn’t mean that CO2 won’t cause global warming. It is like saying “Water is harmless, we all drink it! So this alarmist theory that filling your house with water is harmful to your ability to survive in your house is rubbish!”

Comment on Alan Jones on Climate Change and the Carbon Tax by derek dutton

derek dutton — Thu, 28 Jul 2011 04:36:28 +0000

The claim that the president of the IPCC is a top scietists is at odds with that groups parent body, the United Nations, rejecting their latest bizzare,Global Warming claims as nonsense. Any “scientific ” body that claims Holland will be 3 metres below sea level by 2035, is seriously short of reality. Holland has been 3 metres below sea level for 8,000 years, since the end of the gigantic meltdown of the Arctic. Then one sixth of the earths surface. It created the North Sea and flooded Holland. The Low Countries. Hollands Dykes are not ornaments.

Comment on Alan Jones on Climate Change and the Carbon Tax by derek dutton

derek dutton — Thu, 28 Jul 2011 04:27:50 +0000

All the hype by the carbon tax is immaterial for Australia, the only country with a Kyoto allowance to increase it’s tiny emissions 8%. The reason the government paid economists arrived at $25 a tonne, the highest in the world, was because of the scarcity of them. China is $1.50 a Tonne and neither will reduce a kilo of harmless CO2 emissions, vital for life. Everything about the climate change scam is false. false that the minor IPCC is the foremost authority on the climate. Even their parent body, the UN, dismissed their latest bizzare claims as nonsense.

Comment on Alan Jones on Climate Change and the Carbon Tax by Aegist

Aegist — Wed, 13 Jul 2011 09:58:36 +0000

Oh, I just re-read what I wrote, and what I was trying to say is that they come from all of the first world countries, not that all scientists are from first world countries. What I was trying to say was that any attempt to claim that the science is a political movement, misses the fact that all of the competing political systems produce scientists who agree that climate change is a problem. I might try to re-word it a bit to make this a bit clearer. Thanks for the comment.

Comment on Alan Jones on Climate Change and the Carbon Tax by Steven Rashid

Steven Rashid — Wed, 13 Jul 2011 06:32:54 +0000

Very good article. Im really sick of Alan Jones getting these “experts” in and nobody constructing a decent argument against.

I do have issue with one thing you say, and that is that the Scientists who write these article are not idiots and are all from first world countries. Im not sure what you implication here but some of the top scientists in the world are from “third” world countries including Rajendra parchuri who chaired the IPCC.